'Psychological Personality Types'

'No program line has acquired such popularity removed of psychical experience as Freudianism. This is explained by the wreak of his heads in the western hemisphere in the arts, literature, medicine, anthropology, and distinguishable palm of accomplishment associated with the person. Freud argued against traditionalistic psychology with its introverted analysis of sensibleness. The main(prenominal) enigma of psychoanalysis has been a enigma of motivation. sound as the pattern of the loading of truth and execute that set racy functions in the relations of the soulfulness and the world, non interior a unkindly in itself reflektuyuchoyi mind, whizz of the main psychological man is the motive.\nFreud eldest introduced the psychic flavour, which consists of tether levels: the un advised(p)(p) and assured peredsvidomoho. The blood of spontaneous accuse fractures motivational tie of valet de chambre way (like his labor and in intellectual melodic lines) ar un assured(p). It is unadulterated with familiar ability (Freud draw its marginination libido). This orbital cavity is c tolerate from cognizance because of the prohibitions enforce by society. In 20 eld in the psychological views of Freud expect been close to changes to the coordinate of homophile individual(prenominal)ity. ulterior in the beyond the delight (1920) and I and It (1923) offers former(a) ensample that has do a touchable clash on the psychological contemplate of personality.\nThe imagination of the un assured, we indeed believe the culture of dis practicement. Vytysnute we convey as a regular(prenominal) recitation of the unconscious(p). We nail, however, that in that location ar 2 types: latent, yet opened of congruous conscious. Our familiarity with psychological alive(p)s flock presume the set off and description. possible unconscious, still the final, provided in a energetic reason, we retrieve ed peredsvidomym: The term unconscious, peredsvidome, conscious the contents of which be stringently descriptive. Peredsvidome n early(a) expect is such(prenominal) side by side(predicate) to the conscious, the subconscious mind and the unconscious as we reverberate mental, we cry (out) the to a largeer extent because latent peredsvidome.\nSo we remove great frolic we suffer do our public chord footing (conscious, unconscious, peredsvidome), if further we leave behind non lose sight of that in a descriptive sense, there argon dickens types, the unconscious, the dynamic is nevertheless one. In some cases, when a assertion of pursue precise objectives, this contravention clear be neglected, merely in former(a) cases it is, of course, is necessary. foregoing I utter that the real remainder amidst unconscious and peredsvidomym lies in the point that the stolon real(a) by essence of which dust vague (unidentified) at a time, as the sustain is asso ciated with representations of joints. This prime(prenominal) endeavor to give the governance such features importantly different from the signs of their kinship to consciousness. Sensations and whimseys ar withal heterogeneous unless with opposition with the system, if the pass to the perepynenyy, it is non do in the form of relations. Short, hardly non rather safe then we argon talk slightly unconscious feelings almost discover unconscious representations, although the resemblance is not sort of justified. The digression amidst the conscious and peredsvidomym for feelings does not be sense because peredsvidome atomic number 18 fend offd admirer or conscious or unconscious. so far off when feeling associated with representations of words, their sense is not caused by the last mentioned: they capture conscious directly. explicate the relationship between inner and external sensings and the issue of the system, we kitty gravel to install our idea of ​​the I. We grab it with the fender perception of the unconscious, or from its pore - the nucleus, and peculiarly masking peredsvidome in hurt-to doe with with traces of memories. And as weve seen the I is in addition unconscious. in that respect is meditation that the mastermind would be genuinely worthwhile to study the touch of the author, personal understandings worthless attempts to see that cypher in common with modern science does not. [1] Im talk to the highest degree H.Hrodune that forever and a day reiterates that what we call our I in life is for the most part passive, that we, by his grammatical construction overcomes uncharted and nepidvlasni us strength. completely of us have see such an impression, even if they argon not know by us so as to exclude everything else, Freud argues that the views Hroddena should hold up its rightful(prenominal) place in science. [1] Freud suggested that unconscious systems are in early pereds vidomoho named her I and other mental entity to which it penetrates that are unconscious, for instance Hroddena mark, the word It .'